36
any other item of Expenditure detailed in the Estimates lain before Parliament.
6.
Take for example the Year 1853/54 See Return The actual Expenditure of the Colony AVAI £36,418. Parliament voted towards this £9,200.
The balance £27,218 was defrayed local resources - The total Expenditure of the year May be roughly distributed as follows: - Salaries Public Works ann- Police - Gacks and Other charges £20,000 16,418. Total £36,418
The Salaries appear to have been about equally divided between those who did and those who did not pay superannuation abatements. Under these circumstances, I confess I cannot see why the £9,200 voted by Parliament should be deemed to have been expended on Salaries, any more than on any other item of Expenditure; but even supposing there were some reason for connecting the grant with salaries, it would seem then fully as reasonable if not more so to set it off against the principal Salaries on the list such as those of the Governor - Chief Justice - Attorney General - and others amounting to £10,000 which were not liable to superannuation deductions, as against those smaller salaries also amounting to £10,000 from which abatements were made
6.
36
any other item of Expenditure detailed in the
Estimates lain before Parliament.
6.
Take for example the
Year 1853/54 See Return
The actual Expenditure of the Colony
AVAI
£36, 418. Parliament voted lowards this
£9.200.
The balance £27, 218 was defrayed
local resources - The total Ex
annexed
from
Expenditure
of the
year
May
be
roughly
distributed as -
follows: -
Salaries
Public Works ann-
Police - Gacks and
Other charges
£20,000
16.418.
Total £36,418 -- " - -
The Salaries appear to have been about. equally divided between those who did
•
and those who did not pay superannuation
abatements. Under these circumstances, I
Confess
I cannot see why the £ 9.200 voted by Parliament should be deemed to have been
expended on Salaries, any
other item
more than
on
any
of Expenditure - ; but even supposing
there were some reason
grant
with salaries.
for connecting the
of which I may be ignorant,
it would seem then fully
as reasonable if not-
more so to set it off against the principal
Salaries on the list such as those of the ~ -Governor - Chief Justice - Attorney General -
-
and others amounting to £10,000 which were
- not liable to superannuation deductions, as
those smatter salaries also amounting
against
to £10,000 from which abatements were made
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.